The guardian | 5 hours ago | Lifestyle
Many of us may ponder the necessity of wearing underwear in public, to avoid potential embarrassing incidents such as Lenny Kravitz's famous pants-splitting performance in Stockholm. In 2015, during an energetic rendition of 'American Woman,' Kravitz split his leather pants, inadvertently revealing himself to his audience. The question this provokes is, how common is it for individuals to not wear underwear in public settings?
The occurrence got people pondering about the literal ins and outs of going commando, a lifestyle choice that may be more popular than anticipated. Not limited to rock stars, it seems that there are multiple reasons for an individual to choose to forego the layer of clothing, and this choice has different implications depending on the person and situation in question.
Some experts believe that certain situations may make opting for underwear the better choice. While going bare underneath might be comfortable for some, it could prove risky in situations where clothing runs the risk of tearing, like during an energetic performance.
Overall, whether to wear underwear or not seems to be a personal preference, heavily depending on different factors such as comfort, circumstances, and personal style. However, incidents like Kravitz's unforgettable performance might serve as a poignant reminder of the potential risks of rocking out without that extra layer of protection.