A team of Italian researchers is drawing attention once again after revealing what they claim is a second hidden underground city beneath an ancient Egyptian pyramid. You’ve likely heard about their previous headline-making announcement, which stirred debate within the scientific community. Now, these researchers say their latest findings only add to their earlier claims—but not everyone is convinced.
Original Claims Suggested A Vast Underground World Beneath The Khafre Pyramid
The first announcement came from researchers Corrado Malanga, Filippo Biondi, and Armando Mei. They stated they had used radar pulses to detect vertical cylinders buried roughly 2,000 feet beneath the Khafre Pyramid. That pyramid, located within the famous Giza Pyramid Complex, is one of the most iconic structures of Ancient Egypt. You probably recognize it as one of the three main pyramids in Giza, built during Egypt’s Fourth Dynasty.
The scientists claimed that these vertical cylinders housed chambers, an intricate water system, and cube-shaped formations. According to them, the network resembled a full underground city, possibly containing the mythical Hall of Records. They described it as a possible archive of ancient documents, even suggesting it could be linked to the lost continent of Atlantis. These claims captured the imagination of the public but also raised eyebrows in academic circles.
New Findings Reportedly Point To A Second Underground Structure
Now, the researchers have added another layer to their theory. According to The Daily Mail, the trio claims they’ve found similar vertical shafts beneath the Menkaure Pyramid, which is also located in the Giza Complex. They report there is a 90 percent probability that these new formations are consistent with the earlier ones discovered beneath the Khafre Pyramid.
According to their data, the Menkaure Pyramid also conceals a significant underground layout. This layout has not been verified by outside experts or peer-reviewed publications. That detail matters greatly if you’re relying on scientific validation. The claim, although dramatic, remains speculative and controversial until tested through rigorous academic processes.
Egyptologists And Experts Challenge The Validity Of The Discovery
The scientific community has not reacted positively to these bold claims. Leading Egyptologist Dr. Zahi Hawass, known for his decades of work on Egyptian archaeology, harshly criticized the announcement. “All this information is completely wrong and has absolutely no scientific basis,” he said. He dismissed the research entirely, labeling it “bulls**t” and calling it “fake news.”
Dr. Hawass has long been a vocal guardian of Egypt’s historical narrative. His expertise adds weight to the skepticism, especially when you consider the methods the researchers say they used. Radar expert Professor Lawrence Conyers of the University of Denver also voiced doubts. He stated that the tools described by the Italian team could not possibly penetrate the ground to the depth claimed. According to Conyers, even if something existed under the pyramid, claiming it was a city would be a “huge exaggeration.”
Radar Technology And The Problem With Data Interpretation
You might be wondering if radar can even detect underground formations that far below the earth’s surface. According to Professor Conyers, it can’t. The equipment used in ground-penetrating radar has known limitations. It is typically effective only to a certain depth, well short of the 2,000 feet cited by the Italian researchers. That makes their conclusion difficult to accept by scientific standards.
Another expert, theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder, addressed the interpretation of the data. She accused the researchers of selectively identifying certain shapes in their radar imagery while ignoring others. “They have randomly identified some structures in their tomography images and ignored others,” she said. She wasn’t subtle in her opinion, stating the entire claim ranked “nine out of 10 on my bulls**t meter.”
A Clash Between Exploration And Established Science
The clash between these researchers and the wider academic community highlights a deeper issue. There’s often tension between those making dramatic claims and those demanding peer-reviewed evidence. If you’ve followed fringe archaeology or alternative theories, you know how often bold ideas stir public interest but face rejection from mainstream experts.
That said, public fascination with Ancient Egypt remains strong. You may be curious, hopeful, or even skeptical about what lies beneath the pyramids. But experts urge caution. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Until these findings are confirmed through rigorous study and published in respected journals, they remain theories—controversial ones at that.
Do you believe there could be hidden cities beneath the ancient pyramids of Egypt? Let us know in the comments on Facebook.
Via: LAD BIBLE
